Action Alert: Support More Wind Energy in Wisconsin

Action Alert: Support More Wind Energy in Wisconsin

Wisconsin’s first 100+ megawatt (MW) wind energy project in more than a decade is seeking approval from the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSC). Badger Hollow Wind has been in development for nearly 10 years, and if approved, it would mark a major step forward in Wisconsin’s energy future. The PSC is accepting public comments on this project now through June 26.

This is your chance to tell the PSC why you support the approval of more wind energy in Wisconsin! Badger Hollow Wind isn’t just about the energy it will produce. The 118 MW facility in Iowa and Grant Counties has many benefits:

  • Economic Growth: Badger Hollow Wind will create hundreds of jobs during construction as well as good-paying, long-term operations and maintenance positions. It will also produce affordable and reliable clean energy for Wisconsin residents. It is expected that this project will produce $3.2 million in additional economic activity in Wisconsin.

  • Community Benefits: The Badger Hollow Wind developer, Invenergy, has been a good community partner, supporting student programs at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville and schools in Iowa and Grant Counties. They’ve also donated to local emergency services and food banks, and more. Once in service, Badger Hollow Wind will contribute more than $500,000 in utility-aid payments each year. Over $300,000 of this will go to Grant and Iowa Counties, and over $200,000 of this will go to the towns of Clifton, Eden, Linden, Mifflin, and Wingville.

  • Landowner Engagement: Invenergy is a good partner to landowners, respecting their property rights and regularly checking in with them to ensure their relationships are positive. Payments to landowners help farmers directly, but Invenergy goes the extra mile by building access roads to turbines that farmers can use for their operations.

  • Environmental Responsibility: Badger Hollow Wind has undergone thorough environmental studies to minimize impact. It will contribute to cleaner air and water and support a healthier Wisconsin. RENEW’s witness estimated that the Badger Hollow Wind will displace fossil fuel generation and avoid over 250,000 tons of CO2 in the first year of operations alone.

Submit your comments today and tell the PSC you support the approval of Badger Hollow Wind. Feel free to use some of the bullet points above to craft your own unique message.

Clean Energy Is the Solution to Our Growing Energy Demand

Clean Energy Is the Solution to Our Growing Energy Demand

A recently published report by the Center for Energy & Environmental Analysis, “Drill More, Pay More – America’s New Energy Paradigm,” indicates the U.S. is facing a unique energy situation characterized by both rising domestic energy prices and increased energy production. Wholesale natural gas prices in the U.S. have increased 93 percent in the first quarter of 2025, compared to the same period last year, despite record-high natural gas production.

At the same time, we have reports on clean energy that show us (Achieving 100% Clean Energy in Wisconsin Report and the companion report The Economic Impacts of Decarbonization in Wisconsin), we don’t just know that Wisconsin can achieve 100% carbon-free electricity by 2050 — we know how to do it. All while maintaining reliability and affordability for consumers. These reports emphasize that most of the projected energy demand through 2050 can be met with the development of more renewables, enhanced energy efficiency, and more flexible energy load management solutions.

We’re now past the point of advocating for clean energy solely because it’s better for the planet. As our energy needs grow, driven by electrification and data demand, it’s critical to invest in solutions that can be brought online quickly and affordably. Methane gas can no longer guarantee the consistent, low prices it once did. In contrast, renewable energy projects like solar and wind can typically be built in about two years, while gas plants often take twice as long to become operational. Supply chain issues and tariff uncertainties are increasing construction times and costs across all sectors, but renewable energy projects can still be constructed more quickly while avoiding the fuel price volatility associated with fossil fuels. With timelines and costs both working against gas, it’s simply not smart business to keep investing in slower, more expensive options when faster, more reliable solutions are within reach.

Utilities across the country continue to tell regulatory bodies and the general public that we can only meet the rising energy demands caused by new data centers with methane gas plants. However, national case studies from companies like Meta and Microsoft have demonstrated that clean energy solutions can meet data center needs when paired with smart load shifting and grid integration. Microsoft, for example, is piloting hydrogen fuel cells as an alternative to fossil fuel backup, while Meta has partnered with the Tennessee Valley Authority to run its Tennessee data center on 800 MW of solar power. These examples show us that there are multiple ways for us to power the digital economy, notably, without fossil fuels.

Even with clean energy opportunities before us, and financial and supply chain barriers to building new methane gas plants, we continue to see utilities propose new natural gas-powered electricity generation. An energy source, which according to analysis by the U.S. Department of Energy, is likely to have three cumulative impacts on consumers: higher natural gas bills, higher electricity bills, and even a higher cost of goods from U.S. manufacturers.

By supporting clean energy solutions, energy efficiency measures, and creative management of our grid, we can reliably support the around-the-clock energy needs of data centers and the needs of everyday Wisconsinites. To ignore these solutions is to ignore good business sense. It is time to recognize that clean energy isn’t an alternative but a practical solution to our growing energy demand.

Action Alert: Tell Legislators Clean Energy Benefits All Americans

Action Alert: Tell Legislators Clean Energy Benefits All Americans

Earlier this week, the House of Representatives passed its version of H.R. 1, the reconciliation package, by a slim majority. The bill now moves to the Senate, where we have another opportunity to advocate for and protect clean energy.

Solar and storage are an American success story, supporting thousands of good jobs, millions in energy savings, and a surging manufacturing sector. However, Congress is considering cutting policies that support this success, threatening billions invested in our communities. This includes harsh restrictions on tax credits while gutting others, or quickly phasing them out.

As it stands, the legislation before Congress falls short of the policies necessary to help the U.S. meet its growing energy demand, create jobs, and continue the successful build-out of the solar and storage supply chain here in the U.S.

We invite you to join us in this effort and urge Congress to defend American energy incentives and protect the economic engine that clean energy has created. In the last two years, American solar and storage have surged. In that time, American-made solar module manufacturing has grown six times.

Solar installations can now provide enough homegrown energy to power more than 40 million homes. This expanding industry also means jobs that pay people well. The solar and storage industry already supports over 280,000 good jobs, many of them right here in Wisconsin.

We already know that solar energy is affordable, abundant, and easy to deploy. So, as America works to meet the rising energy demands of AI, data centers, and advanced manufacturing, clean energy and energy storage are critical to keeping energy bills in check and maintaining our economic competitiveness.

This is a critical moment, and we cannot afford to slow our progress now. We need to double down on clean energy for our economy, our communities, and our children.

Tell your representative to protect American solar and energy storage!

RENEW Submits Testimony Supporting Fair Net Metering Policy in Northwestern Wisconsin

RENEW Submits Testimony Supporting Fair Net Metering Policy in Northwestern Wisconsin

On May 14, the RENEW Wisconsin policy team submitted testimony calling for no change to how Rice Lake Utilities (RLU) compensates customers for the solar energy they produce. This testimony is in opposition to what RLU has suggested for their net energy metering (NEM) policy, which would be a reduction in compensation for solar customers.

In this case, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSC) will consider a NEM formula for systems at 20 kilowatts (kW) and below, and a formula for systems between 20 and 100 kW. Systems that are 20 kW or below are typically residential rooftop arrays, whereas the larger ones are often on businesses or municipal buildings. RLU currently has three customers with systems above 20 kW, all of which are schools.

Although Rice Lake Utilities is a smaller utility in northwestern Wisconsin and does not have many customers with solar, what they have proposed could change the precedent at the PSC. RENEW has decided to intervene and provide testimony to prevent the potential for statewide changes to NEM policy.

RENEW’s policy team provided evidence to the PSC in support of maintaining the status quo for both larger and smaller solar systems. We also shared potential alternatives for how RLU could transition away from the status quo should the PSC decide to allow a change to NEM benefits. These alternatives are more in line with how utility-avoided costs for Wisconsin utilities are calculated.

Utility-avoided costs are the cost an electric utility pays to generate or purchase power. This could be described as — an avoided expense that a utility would have paid by generating themselves or purchasing it from a third party, had it not come from the customer’s solar array.

RENEW feels that before the PSC decides this case, they should consider the future of municipally-owned utility payment structures for NEM. RLU’s net monthly excess generation formula for NEM currently points to their base cost of power as its avoided cost reference, and that reference remains financially viable for RLU, as well as most Wisconsin utilities. With that in mind, we are concerned that the PSC’s decision in this case might set a precedent for other similar cases.

RENEW is hopeful that the PSC will agree that it is best to leave the current NEM pay structures in place until their Value of Solar Study and NEM investigation concludes.

Next Steps for RENEW

The RLU case is ongoing, and RENEW will have the opportunity to submit rebuttal testimony and participate in a party hearing this June. We will continue to advocate for fair payments to utility customers with solar arrays. There will also be an opportunity for the public to comment on the case before a decision from the PSC in July.

RENEW Wisconsin Recommends Next Steps in Value of Solar Study

RENEW Wisconsin Recommends Next Steps in Value of Solar Study

On Wednesday, RENEW Wisconsin’s Policy team submitted comments to the Public Service Commission (PSC) in response to the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s (LBNL) review of the Value of Solar Studies (VoSS). These comments represent a critical step toward shaping the future of solar energy in Wisconsin, with several organizations, including 350.org, the Wisconsin Environmental Initiative, Northwind Solar, and Appleton Solar, joining RENEW in support of these recommendations. Other organizations and utilities also submitted separate comments.

The context for this study and the review stems from rate case proceedings in the fall of 2023 involving Alliant Energy and Madison Gas & Electric (MGE). These rate cases included proposals to reduce or eliminate the current Net Energy Metering (NEM) policies for solar customers in these two utility territories. If approved, such changes would have reduced the financial benefits for consumers with solar arrays at their homes or businesses. These proposals were ultimately rejected by the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSC), and the Commission agreed to gather more information in a separate statewide investigatory docket. Last year, the PSC began working with Berkeley Lab and other national lab staff on a VoSS to better understand the full benefits of distributed solar energy to the grid and the economy.

RENEW’s comments offer key recommendations to strengthen solar policy in Wisconsin, ensuring it supports sustainable growth and a fair, data-driven approach to valuing solar energy. Here are the main points highlighted in RENEW’s submission:

  1. Gather utility data required to estimate solar adoption rates

Accurate and comprehensive data are essential for determining solar energy adoption rates across Wisconsin. RENEW recommends that the PSC gather data from utilities, formulate methodologies, and report on solar adoption rates. This will enable policymakers to make informed decisions on future solar policies.

  1. Decide whether an independent VoSS is appropriate for Wisconsin at this time

Before pursuing an independent Value of Solar Study (VoSS), RENEW recommends that the PSC assess whether such a study is appropriate for Wisconsin at this time. This evaluation should consider the unique circumstances of the state, including its zero-carbon energy goals and economic landscape.

  1. Create more robust and consistent NEM policy throughout Wisconsin

RENEW advocates for the development of more robust and consistent Net Energy Metering (NEM) policies across the state. NEM is a cornerstone of Wisconsin’s solar energy development, and strengthening this policy will help ensure fairness and consistency for solar customers.

  1. When appropriate, establish a VoSS stakeholder process and methodology to consider all values presented in the LBNL VOSS Review

When the time is right, RENEW recommends adopting a fair, transparent, and 

stakeholder-driven approach to a VoSS. This process should consider all the values outlined in the LBNL VoSS Review (economic, environmental, and grid-related) to ensure a comprehensive understanding of solar’s full benefits.

  1. Contract with a third-party VoSS consultant using a stakeholder-driven review process

To ensure a fair and credible outcome, RENEW urges the PSC to engage an independent consultant to assist in leading the Value of Solar analysis. An experienced third-party expert can provide objective insight and guide the process in a way that respects the input of all participants, including utilities, customers, advocates, and other stakeholders.

  1. Establish either a statewide or utility-specific VoSS driven by data

RENEW supports the creation of a statewide or utility-specific VoSS that is grounded in data and accurately reflects the value solar brings to the grid. This study should be informed by the utility data and stakeholder feedback gathered throughout the process.

  1. Establish a glide path towards VoS tariffs only when NEM solar adoption rates increase to 10% in utility service territories

Finally, RENEW recommends a gradual transition to Value of Solar (VoS) tariffs, with a clear glide path based on solar adoption rates. Specifically, the transition to VoS tariffs should occur only when solar adoption reaches 10% in utility service territories.

Next Steps: Stay Tuned for Updates!

At this time, the PSC has not announced the next steps as the investigation remains open. However, the PSC will likely take up a verbal decision on the next steps soon. We’ll keep a close eye on the process and share any important updates with you as they happen.

Stay tuned for further developments as we continue to push for policies that support a clean, sustainable, and equitable energy future for Wisconsin.

Better Together: How Community Engagement Improves Large-Scale Solar Projects

Better Together: How Community Engagement Improves Large-Scale Solar Projects

As we work to decarbonize Wisconsin’s economy, the need for large-scale solar (LSS) development continues to grow. But solar panels alone won’t build our clean energy future. How developers and advocates plan, engage, and invest in communities can determine whether a project is a symbol of prosperity or a source of resistance. The process makes all the difference.

Several Wisconsin organizations are working directly with communities to shape how clean energy projects are planned and built. RENEW Wisconsin and Clean Wisconsin support large-scale solar developments by highlighting the benefits they bring to local economies and landowners. Wisconsin Land and Water supports county conservation staff and local officials by providing guidance on land use and policy considerations related to energy siting. UW-Madison Extension educates and engages communities through RESET (Renewable Energy Siting & Engagement for Tomorrow), a program that helps communities prepare and plan for large-scale renewables.

A 2023 research article titled “Good fences make good neighbors: Stakeholder perspectives on the local benefits and burdens of large-scale solar energy development in the United States,” explores how LSS solar projects are perceived and how to align solar development with local values. Through interviews with residents, developers, and public officials, the researchers found that community pushback is often less about solar and more about how projects are introduced and implemented.

I encourage you to read the full report. In the meantime, here are my four key takeaways from the study that offer guidance for better solar development:

  1. Start with Meaningful Engagement

Public meetings and legal notices aren’t enough. Communities want a seat at the table from day one. Study participants emphasized the need for early, consistent, in-person engagement throughout a project’s timeline, from planning to decommissioning.

Some of the best ideas include hosting solar bus tours, creating local advisory groups, holding job-training workshops, and sharing visuals of project designs. These efforts help demystify the process and show local residents that their input matters.

  1. Empower Local Liaisons

People trust people they know. Using local third-party intermediaries like community champions, nonprofits, or university partners can have a big impact on the success of a project. These liaisons can be the bridge between developers and residents, communicating in ways that resonate locally and holding all parties accountable.

Developers may know solar, but local partners know their communities. The best projects use these strengths to build trust and reduce tensions.

  1. Be Honest About Tradeoffs

No project is perfect, and developers must communicate tradeoffs transparently, whether it’s changes to the visual landscape, land-use concerns, or vegetation preferences. Residents should be invited to learn from neighboring communities to discuss the long-term impacts of land use. Developers and advocates should also be forthcoming about other aspects of the project, including the visibility of substations and transmission lines, as well as any local resources that may be impacted during construction.

Transparency and clarity can go a long way in building trust, dispelling rumors and misinformation, and improving overall community sentiment about a solar project.

  1. Demonstrate and Deliver Real Community Benefits

Residents want to see that these solar projects will improve their quality of life. Developers and advocates should highlight local benefits, including access to good-paying jobs, fair land lease payments, or energy savings for nearby households.

The study found that some developers overlook the input of project neighbors. In addition, the profits from land leases sometimes go to absentee owners or corporations. Officials and communities are calling for stronger community benefits agreements that ensure the value of clean energy stays local and lasts long after the developers have left town.

We Can Develop Solar That Works for Everyone

This study is a reminder that solar success isn’t just about megawatts. It’s about relationships and transparency. In many ways, the responsibility of this community engagement work begins with developers. Fortunately, RENEW has several developer members who lead by example, showing how authentic community engagement can lead to better outcomes. Wisconsin’s most successful LSS projects demonstrate that if we want clean energy to power a better future, we need to build projects with communities, not just in them.

Let’s continue to engage in policies and practices that make solar smarter, more inclusive, and grounded in local Wisconsin values.