by jboullion | Feb 20, 2014 | Uncategorized
The following article by Tom Content was published in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on 2/20/2014
Milwaukee’s solar initiative is looking to expand on its first group-buy solar initiative last year, which helped lead to more than 30 installations across the city.
That’s three times as many solar installations than in 2012, and the city credits the growth to a solar group-purchase program that began in the Riverwest neighborhood.
The public-private partnership helps residents take advantage of lower-cost solar installations through volume purchasing. The group buy was responsible for 16 installations in Riverwest, along with another in Bay View.
“The solar group-buy model has proved successful because it provides education on the technology, financing solutions and utilizes the strength of volume purchasing to bring the cost down even more,” said Amy Heart, manager of Milwaukee Shines, a project of the city’s Office of Environmental Sustainability.
The Solar Bay View initiative kicked off Wednesday, with more informational sessions scheduled in the weeks ahead. Enrollment will take place between now and May.
Solar Bay View’s sponsors include Riverwest Cooperative Alliance, Milwaukee Shines and the Midwest Renewable Energy Association.
The program is open to Milwaukee-area residents outside Bay View, but its main focus will be within the neighborhood.
“The concept of a group-purchasing program fits right in with the principles of cooperatives everywhere. People come together to meet an otherwise unmet need,” said Peter Murphy, who works with the Riverwest Cooperative Alliance, an organization comprised of local cooperatives. “In this case, the Bay View neighborhood has a unique opportunity to show the rest of Milwaukee how people power can accomplish meaningful and practical goals, like energy independence.”
Paula Papanek of Bay View put 12 solar panels on her roof a few years back and was able to take advantage of the Riverwest group purchase last year to install 18 more panels on her garage. She’s volunteered to advise neighborhood residents on what questions to ask and provide feedback on her own experience.
“It’s important that homeowners have the opportunity to talk to somebody who’s done it as opposed to hearing from a sales rep,” she said.
Adam Gusse, vice president of H&H Solar Energy Services in Madison, said the Riverwest group purchase program followed a similar one in Madison.
Group-buy participants saved about 20% compared with a solar installation of a comparable size, Gusse said.
Some of the savings came about because so many projects were physically close together, from buying greater quantities of panels, and from reduced sales and marketing costs, he said.
“It was really great to have a coalition of many different organizations coming together to make for what is a great success for solar in Milwaukee,” Gusse said.
by jboullion | Feb 19, 2014 | Uncategorized
Note: This update follows my commentary posted two weeks ago documenting emerging changes in the U.S. natural gas market picture. It is my thesis that the current understanding of supply and demand trends leaves us unprepared for nonlinear events like this winter’s weather.
–Michael Vickerman
There is nothing quite like a long stretch of below-normal temperatures to stoke the heating fuel markets. Last week (February 13) the Energy Information Agency reported a withdrawal of 237 billion cubic feet (bcf) from inventories, a 12% decline from the previous week’s level. As indicated in the table below, inventories have shrunk to 1,686 bcf.
It’s a safe bet that this week’s withdrawal number will be even larger than last week’s total, which would send storage volumes below 1,500 bcf. It’s worth remembering that there is at least six weeks left in the current heating season. For comparison purposes, the previous heating season ended in the second week of April with inventories down to 1,673 bcf. This has already been a winter to remember, and it’s not over by a long shot.
It is finally dawning on traders that supplies are the tightest they’ve been since the 2003-2004 winter. Prices have now breached the $5.00/MMBtu mark and may climb some more. However, it will take more than a brief foray into $5.00+ territory to sustain extraction activity at a level that can fully replenish inventories in time for the next heating season. And, as noted in my original commentary, current prices are still low relative to 2007-2008 levels, and are unlikely to induce significant reductions in demand.
As reported in the February 14, 2014, edition of Ravenna Capital Management’s The Master Resource Report, Conoco Phillips has no immediate plans to jump-start exploration and extraction activity based on recent market conditions.
ConocoPhillips wants benchmark natural gas prices to remain over $5 for as long as two years before the company boosts spending on natural gas, Chief Financial Officer Jeff Sheets said in a Jan. 30 interview.
“We won’t be leaders in getting out there and drilling natural gas,” he said.
I strongly encourage readers of this blog to check in weekly with The Master Resource Report, an educational newsletter written by Jim Hansen of KMS Financial Services. Jim is a keen observer of energy markets and has been tracking the emerging disconnects in the domestic natural gas market since the summer of 2013.
I’ll send out another update in a week. In the meantime, let’s celebrate today’s foretaste of spring weather, while Mother Nature slaves away on the next winter storm rolling our way.
Heating Season
|
Start Volume
(in bcf)
|
Remaining volume after 6th
week of year
|
Difference
|
2013-2014
|
3834
|
1686
|
2148
|
2012-2013
|
3929
|
2684
|
1245
|
2011-2012
|
3805
|
2888
|
927
|
2010-2011
|
3833
|
2144
|
1689
|
2009-2010
|
3837
|
2215
|
1622
|
2008-2009
|
3488
|
2020
|
1468
|
2007-2008
|
3545
|
2062
|
1483
|
2006-2007
|
3461
|
2347
|
1114
|
2005-2006
|
3282
|
2368
|
914
|
2004-2005
|
3327
|
1906
|
1421
|
2003-2004
|
3167
|
1603
|
1328
|
by jboullion | Feb 14, 2014 | Uncategorized
An opinion piece by Matt Neumann published by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on Friday, February 14, 2014
An especially cold Wisconsin winter like this one might get you thinking about how you keep your home warm and bright — especially when storms knock down power lines and shortages triple propane prices.
But if your thoughts turn to generating some of your power on your own property, your efforts at self-reliance might be derailed by Wisconsin law. It’s not clear if property owners in Wisconsin are allowed to pursue some of the energy options available to Americans in dozens of other states. It’s a strange way to limit liberty, and it should change.
Right now, Wisconsin law does not clearly permit third-party ownership of solar panels — an arrangement homeowners and business people in other states are using to generate power right at home, often with no up-front cost. And Wisconsin’s restrictions on net metering — which limit your right to sell power you generate back into the grid — are keeping larger businesses and institutions such as hospitals and universities from taking advantage of money-saving energy options that companies and organizations in other states are using to generate their own power, save money and help the environment.
Read the rest of Matt Neumann’s opinion…
by jboullion | Feb 10, 2014 | Uncategorized
Note: This update follows my commentary posted last week documenting emerging changes in the U.S. natural gas market picture and discussing whether the altered picture will occasion additional repricing upward to balance supply with expected demand increases.
–Michael Vickerman
On February 6th, EIA reported that natural gas storage volumes were 270 billion cubic feet (bcf) under last week’s withdrawal numbers. That number reflects data submitted to EIA on January 31st.
Going into February this year, the quantity of natural gas in storage (1.923 bcf) is half of what it was at the start of the current heating season (3,834 bcf). The heating season generally ends around April 1.
I expect the next EIA report (February 13) to easily surpass the 200 bcf threshold.
In the previous 10 years, the largest amount of gas withdrawn from inventories during the entire heating season was 2,311 bcf. That occurred during the winter of 2007-2008. Thus far this season, a total of 1,911 bcf has been taken out of storage. If the next two reported withdrawals (Feb. 13th and 20th) exceed a combined total of 400 bcf, this winter’s withdrawals will exceed that total, and that will happen before the end of February.
Though this is shaping up to be the coldest winter in 20 years, the price of natural gas still remains below $5.00. How many more weeks of below-average temperatures will it take to move the floor price of natural gas to $5.00 and higher? The game-changer narrative is still hanging tough.
Over the weekend, I checked Chicago and Madison weather forecasts for the week of February 10th. To the extent there is a warm-up in sight, it will happen Thursday and Friday. This respite will bring temperatures back to seasonal levels, but don’t expect it to last. The weather forecast in Madison for the Valentine’s Day/President Day weekend heralds a return to below-normal temperatures.
The cold weather is also taking a bite out of current extraction volumes, as evidenced in the highlighted passage of the Bloomberg News article below. While pace of extraction will definitely pick up as winter gives way to spring, the question going forward is whether supply can increase by a record-setting 2.7 trillion tcf between the end of the current heating season and the beginning of the next. We’re starting to enter uncharted territory.
by jboullion | Jan 31, 2014 | Uncategorized
Biomass fuel as pellets or cord wood can assist more than 250,000 propane customers in Wisconsin, reducing the impact of propane supply shortages and price spikes. Propane users predominantly live in rural areas not served by natural gas. These are the same areas where wood and other biomass products are available in large quantity in Wisconsin. RENEW Wisconsin and the Heating the Midwest organization both advocate for increased usage of this local, renewable fuel to reduce dependence on imported propane.
Click here for the RENEW’s full Biomass Press Release
by jboullion | Jan 31, 2014 | Uncategorized
A commentary by Michael Vickerman
As this latest blast of arctic air slides away from the Upper Midwest, now is a good time to take stock of the conventional wisdom that grips natural gas markets today.
The Energy Information Administration (EIA) last week reported another large weekly withdrawal of natural gas–230 billion cubic feet (bcf)–from underground inventories. While this is a big number, it is well short of the record-setting 287 bcf withdrawal reported two weeks earlier. This week’s report may eclipse that number.
The heavy demand for natural gas this winter leaves inventories at their lowest levels for this time of year since 2004. Even if temperatures returned to normal this February and March, we could finish the heating season with only one-third the volume in storage back in early November.
Remember the extraordinary surplus that accumulated in the winter of 2011-2012? It’s ancient history now. Without a moment’s thought to what was happening, we managed to Hoover through every last cubic foot of ballooning inventories that in 2012 sent gas prices plunging down to levels not seen since 2002. One month into 2014, the pendulum has clearly swung over to the deficit side of the supply-demand equilibrium.
The problem is less a shortage of supply—domestic extraction volumes have risen nearly 50 percent in a mere eight years—than an accelerating “longage” of demand. Notwithstanding the sluggish economy, baseline consumption is rising, stoked by low commodity prices that discourage conservation efforts and a growing supply of residences and businesses to heat. Even though power companies scaled back their use of natural gas in 2013, overall gas consumption rose 2 percent from 2012 levels, according to EIA estimates.
Stir into that dynamic the coldest winter in the Upper Midwest this century and spice it with slowing production growth reported last year, and you have all but one of the ingredients needed for a dramatic upward re-pricing of this precious energy resource.
What is the missing ingredient here? A new narrative to combat the “shale gas miracle” myth that has been drummed into every adult American’s brain and belief system, courtesy of a well-financed and expertly orchestrated public relations campaign sponsored by the fossil energy industry.
Most Americans now believe that there is enough recoverable natural gas lurking under our feet to heat and power this country well into the next century. A fairy tale to be sure, but as long as it is one we believe to be true, we will have trouble recognizing the signals that tell us that the supply-demand picture is tightening.
Let’s focus on the supply picture for a moment. Did anyone notice that natural gas extraction volumes rose by only 1 percent in 2013? This was “the lowest annual growth since 2005,” the EIA wrote, noting also that “this production growth was essentially flat when compared to the 5 percent growth in 2012 and the 7 percent growth in 2011.” That modest bump failed to keep pace with EIA’s estimate for increased gas usage last year.
In spite of the recent record-setting withdrawals, the price of natural gas, now around $5.00 per MMBtu, is substantially below the $8.00 threshold that it sold for in January 2008, even though the amount of gas in storage then was 13 percent higher than today’s volumes.
One market analyst who clearly hasn’t noticed the changing picture told Bloomberg reporter Christine Buurma earlier this week that “the U.S. market remains awash in gas,” and dismissed the recent price rally as “transitory and not sustainable.” This analyst believes that prices could drop back to $4.00, a level widely thought several months ago to represent the price ceiling for this commodity.
Not to be outdone, another market analyst predicted a retreat to $3.00 prices by 2016. How this resurgence of supply can be accomplished when prices are dropping is not explained.
Here we see the power of the shale gas “game-changer” myth. Output growth is slackening and weather-related demand is spiking, yet energy analysts and market commentators still expect 2014’s prices to conform to the pattern set several years ago, when we were truly awash in gas.
While the rock bottom prices of 2012 proved very effective in working supplies back down to normal levels, they have also motivated energy companies to conserve cash, cut their exploration budgets, and squeeze as much product as possible from known reserves. Having operated in survival mode since the great gas bubble of 2012, these firms are too cash-strapped to ramp up exploration and extraction activity. What they would need to make that happen is, first and foremost, a return to 2008-level prices.
What is not sustainable for much longer is $4.00 natural gas, especially in light of certain physical and economic realities, such as:
- Steep decline rates in the output from wells tapping into shale gas released by hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”);
- Continuing expansion of gas-fired generating capacity substituting for coal and nuclear power plants now being retired; and
- Accelerating investments in infrastructure to liquefy domestically produced natural gas for export to Europe and Asia, which would bring to bear global pricing pressures on a commodity currently enjoying a substantial discount relative to overseas markets.
On the last point, for a taste of what global pricing pressure can do to a formerly low-cost energy source, observe the supply-demand-pricing dynamic that is now sending Midwest propane markets into gyrations. True, a number of unforeseeable events, some of them weather-related, converged to elevate propane use over the last six months, but in a globalized market, the people who can pay the most for a valuable commodity are often not the ones who need it the most.
Anyone who has ever watched a football game in January knows that subzero temperatures can be a game-changer, too. Perhaps this remarkable stretch of winter weather will be just the thing to pierce through the veil of wishful thinking and comforting fairy tales that undermine our collective ability to face our uncertain energy future, and to make all necessary preparations.
Heating Season
|
Start Volume
|
Remaining volume after 4th week of year
|
Difference
|
2013-2014
|
3834
|
2193
|
1641
|
2012-2013
|
3929
|
2996
|
933
|
2011-2012
|
3805
|
3098
|
717
|
2010-2011
|
3833
|
2542
|
1291
|
2009-2010
|
3837
|
2521
|
1316
|
2008-2009
|
3488
|
2374
|
1114
|
2007-2008
|
3545
|
2536
|
1009
|
2006-2007
|
3461
|
2757
|
704
|
2005-2006
|
3282
|
2494
|
788
|
2004-2005
|
3327
|
2270
|
1057
|
2003-2004
|
3167
|
2063
|
1104
|
Source: AmericanOilman.com
Michael Vickerman is program and policy director of RENEW Wisconsin, an independent, 501(c)(3) nonprofit that leads and represents businesses, organizations and individuals who seek more clean, renewable energy in Wisconsin. More information on RENEW’s Web site at www.renewwisconsin.org.
by jboullion | Jan 30, 2014 | Uncategorized
A recent propane shortage in the Midwest has led to a fivefold increase in prices. The Midwest has the nation’s highest share of propane users, many of which are in rural areas. Responding to this volatile situation, the governors of Illinois, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin have declared state of emergencies.
One explanation being offered for the shortage is exportation. While domestic propane production has actually increased over the past five years, the amount of barrels exported has grown significantly.
Click here for a further analysis of the Midwest’s propane shortage.
by jboullion | Jan 29, 2014 | Uncategorized
Every day at cheese factories in northwestern Wisconsin, tanker trucks haul away thousands of gallons of waste-water. Much of it is taken to nearby farms, where it is sprayed across the fields as fertilizer.
The waste is high in nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen. If it runs off the fields into nearby lakes and rivers, it can cause unhealthy amounts of algae in the water.
GreenWhey Energy, a new company in Turtle Lake, is now taking some of that waste, removing much of the harmful material, and using it to generate electricity.
Read more in the article by Greg Seitz’ at St. Croix 360, “New ‘Whey Forward for Clean Water”
by jboullion | Jan 23, 2014 | Uncategorized
RENEW
Wisconsin’s Michael Vickerman comments in the Des Moines Register
regarding power purchase agreements in Iowa and the regional
implications of a case being heard at the Iowa Supreme Court today.
by jboullion | Jan 16, 2014 | Uncategorized
Below is RENEW’s statement on AB 596, a bill to expand the universe of renewable
energy credits that utilities can use to comply with Wisconsin’s
Renewable Electricity Standard. The bill would allow utilities to apply
renewable energy credits from certified generators toward their
renewable electricity requirements, irrespective of when the generator
was placed in service. The current PSC rule on renewable energy credits
permits utilities to apply renewable energy credits created by
qualifying generators only if they were placed in service in 2010 or
after.
Statement of RENEW
Wisconsin in Opposition to AB596
Assembly Committee
on Energy and Utilities
January 9, 2014
RENEW Wisconsin leads and represents businesses,
organizations, and individuals who seek more clean renewable energy in
Wisconsin. RENEW Wisconsin has been advancing a sustainable energy future for
Wisconsin since 1991. Of our 300+ members, more than 60 are companies
headquartered in Wisconsin.
Wisconsin’s renewable electricity standard (RES), which
requires electricity providers to increase their renewable energy supplies by
six percentage points, has been the primary mechanism for expanding renewable
energy’s share of the state’s electric energy resource mix. I say “has been”
because the utilities are now effectively in full compliance with the law’s
2015 target, according to the Public Service Commission. Without a change in
the 10% target, We Energies’ 50 MW biomass generation plant at Rothschild,
which was placed in service in late 2013, shapes up to be the last
utility-owned renewable power plant leveraged by the RES. As of this moment,
none of the electric providers subject to Wisconsin’s RES has publicly
announced plans to expand their renewable generation portfolio.
The aim of AB 596 is to allow renewable energy credits
created by qualifying renewable facilities older than 2010 to be applied to
Wisconsin’s RES. Because these facilities are already producing renewable
electricity today, the adoption of this bill would not add new kilowatt-hours
to the state’s renewable energy supplies. Moreover, as noted above, Wisconsin’s
electricity providers are already in compliance with the state’s Renewable
Electricity Standard. Therefore, they have no need for the renewable energy
credits (REC’s) that would be created through the adoption of AB 596.
RENEW does not object in principle to policy changes that
allow electricity providers to acquire RECs created by older generators for the
purpose of satisfying their renewable energy requirements, provided that there
is a need for this additional supply of RECs. But that need would be created by
raising our 10% standard, which AB 596 does not do. Absent any provision to
increase the RES above its current levels, this legislation would have no
practical effect on utility resource decisions if adopted.
This legislation begs the question: what is the logic
behind creating new REC’s without creating a rationale for electric utilities
to use them?
We would support the provision proposed here if it were
grounded in legislation to expand the current RES. Sadly, no growth in the RES
is contemplated in this bill, which is why we oppose it.
Why is an expanded RES off the table?
Surely it can’t be the experience of neighboring states.
Wisconsin’s electricity rates are at the high end among Upper Midwest states,
yet it has less installed wind power per capita than its neighboring states.
In 1999, Wisconsin was the first Midwest state to adopt a
Renewable Electricity Standard. In 2006 the Legislature strengthened the
standard, from 2.2% by 2011 to 10% by 2015. Between that time and today, it has
been a highly effective mechanism for creating jobs, spurring demand for
locally manufactured equipment, and increasing the flow of tax revenues and
supplemental income into rural landowners and businesses. All the economic and
environmental objectives that can be achieved with a 10% standard have been
achieved. But the current RES has no capacity left to leverage new supplies of
renewable electricity, and the only way to continue reaping the benefits of a
cleaner, healthier and less financially risky energy mix is to expand and
extend this policy tool. Such a move
would not be rash or radical; indeed, Wisconsin has done it before.
Other states are not sitting still. By the end of 2014, renewable
energy is expected to account for more than 30% of Iowa’s electricity. By 2020,
Minnesota will become the regional powerhouse for solar. By every economic
measure, those two states are outpacing Wisconsin, and their cleaner,
lower-cost energy mix is a significant element in their ability to attract and
sustain new investments. If Wisconsin is serious about competing with Iowa and
Minnesota for new jobs and business opportunities, it needs to put itself back
on a growth track for renewables, and a higher RES is the best vehicle for
accomplishing that. The current policy
drift on energy is not going to get the job done.
Respectfully
submitted,
Don
Wichert
RENEW
Wisconsin Board member